Are you bored with the UPS "brown" campaign? It's basically terrible. It doesn't communicate UPS's strengths or value. What it's really about is that UPS is one company with one logo and color while FedEx is five companies with five colors in their respective logos. So "what can brown do for you?" really means "FedEx has many different services and we think you're too stupid to know which service to use."
Well, I wasn't confused... until I saw this Superbowl ad for FedEx. It's moderately funny but it troubles me: it seems to me that FedEx is responding to the UPS brown campaign by admitting that its division names and colors are indeed confusing to the consumer.
Instead of an ad campaign attempting to explain the products, FedEx should fix the product names so there's no confusion. Or better yet, ignore the technology entirely. Does the consumer care if the package goes by ground or by air? Should we care which service is used? Don't we basically want a package delivered in a certain timeframe regardless of method? I understand if FedEx wants to create some internal affinity for the separate business units employees but the external consumer shouldn't have to care.
By the way, did you ever notice the arrow in the white space between the 'e' and the 'x'? Once you've seen it, you can't not see it.
Comments
More on naming
Are you bored with the UPS "brown" campaign? It's basically terrible. It doesn't communicate UPS's strengths or value. What it's really about is that UPS is one company with one logo and color while FedEx is five companies with five colors in their respective logos. So "what can brown do for you?" really means "FedEx has many different services and we think you're too stupid to know which service to use."
Well, I wasn't confused... until I saw this Superbowl ad for FedEx. It's moderately funny but it troubles me: it seems to me that FedEx is responding to the UPS brown campaign by admitting that its division names and colors are indeed confusing to the consumer.
Instead of an ad campaign attempting to explain the products, FedEx should fix the product names so there's no confusion. Or better yet, ignore the technology entirely. Does the consumer care if the package goes by ground or by air? Should we care which service is used? Don't we basically want a package delivered in a certain timeframe regardless of method? I understand if FedEx wants to create some internal affinity for the separate business units employees but the external consumer shouldn't have to care.
By the way, did you ever notice the arrow in the white space between the 'e' and the 'x'? Once you've seen it, you can't not see it.
More on naming
Are you bored with the UPS "brown" campaign? It's basically terrible. It doesn't communicate UPS's strengths or value. What it's really about is that UPS is one company with one logo and color while FedEx is five companies with five colors in their respective logos. So "what can brown do for you?" really means "FedEx has many different services and we think you're too stupid to know which service to use."
Well, I wasn't confused... until I saw this Superbowl ad for FedEx. It's moderately funny but it troubles me: it seems to me that FedEx is responding to the UPS brown campaign by admitting that its division names and colors are indeed confusing to the consumer.
Instead of an ad campaign attempting to explain the products, FedEx should fix the product names so there's no confusion. Or better yet, ignore the technology entirely. Does the consumer care if the package goes by ground or by air? Should we care which service is used? Don't we basically want a package delivered in a certain timeframe regardless of method? I understand if FedEx wants to create some internal affinity for the separate business units employees but the external consumer shouldn't have to care.
By the way, did you ever notice the arrow in the white space between the 'e' and the 'x'? Once you've seen it, you can't not see it.
Posted on February 05, 2007 at 11:02 PM in Industry News & Commentary, Positioning | Permalink